By Janet Dine, Marios Koutsias
Company Law is a whole and available advisor to the felony framework during which businesses function. Logically dependent and with a readable type, the textual content contains important summaries for every bankruptcy, besides case notes. This re-creation has been completely revised and up to date and is gifted with new livery and new two-colour textual content.
Read or Download Company Law PDF
Best administrative law books
The certain courtroom for Sierra Leone was once created in 2002 to prosecute "persons who undergo the best accountability" for severe violations of foreign humanitarian legislations and Sierra Leonean legislation in Sierra Leone due to the fact 30 November 1996. It begun supplying judgements in March 2003 and may whole its paintings by means of the top of 2007.
Well-being and safeguard at paintings is a various region of analysis and a tough topic for lots of employers. notwithstanding, employers have to become familiar with the topic as a result of their vast legal and civil liabilities below health and wellbeing and protection legislation. This publication is a necessary advisor for medium sized companies who don't have entry to a future health and security pros yet for whom compliance with health and wellbeing and safeguard legislations continues to be crucial.
Content material: bankruptcy 1 the supply of Occupational well-being companies (pages 18–38): bankruptcy 2 The criminal prestige and legal responsibility of the OH expert (pages 39–61): bankruptcy three clinical files and Confidentiality (pages 62–103): bankruptcy four Pre? Employment Screening and healthiness Surveillance (pages 104–131): bankruptcy five healthiness and defense at paintings: the felony legislations (pages 132–176): bankruptcy 6 The legislation of reimbursement: Welfare advantages (pages 177–190): bankruptcy 7 The legislation of reimbursement: Civil legal responsibility (pages 191–231): bankruptcy eight Employment legislation (pages 232–272): bankruptcy nine equivalent possibilities (pages 273–327):
For over 100 years, the antitrust consent decree has been an important weapon within the federal enforcement of antitrust legislation. In Antitrust Consent Decrees in conception and perform, Richard A. Epstein undertakes the 1st systematic research in their use and effectiveness from either a historic and analytical point of view.
- Race, Housing and Community: Perspectives on Policy and Practice
- Introduction to Company Law, 2nd Edition
- The Prosecution and Defense of Public Corruption: The Law and Legal Strategies
- Regierungssysteme Zentral- und Osteuropas: Ein einführendes Lehrbuch (German Edition)
- Australian Administrative Law: Fundamentals, Principles and Doctrines
- Challenging Boardroom Homogeneity: Corporate Law, Governance, and Diversity
Additional resources for Company Law
In Salomon’s cases, both the Court of Appeal and the judge at the first instance thought that they had before them just such a case of fraud. Since there was no evidence of dishonest intent in that case, it seems that these courts were using ‘fraud’ in a very wide sense. Indeed, they seem to have regarded the formation of the company so that the business could henceforth be carried on with limited liability as sufficient evidence of ‘fraud’. To take such a wide view would defeat the whole notion of the separate existence of the company and make it impossible for small private companies to function in any way differently from partnerships.
There were, however, no personal dealings between the managing director and the plaintiff. Fraud The ability to hide behind the corporate veil could be a powerful weapon in the hands of those with fraudulent tendencies. The courts have therefore always reserved the right to ignore a company which is formed or used merely to perpetrate a dishonest scheme. In Salomon’s cases, both the Court of Appeal and the judge at the first instance thought that they had before them just such a case of fraud. Since there was no evidence of dishonest intent in that case, it seems that these courts were using ‘fraud’ in a very wide sense.
So, the three basic elements of passing off are reputation, misrepresentation and damage to goodwill. In Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd & Anor  EWCA Civ 1499, the issue was the defence arising from the use of one’s own name in business. Although Mr Asprey was using his own name, that name could be associated with a different retail shop (a famous jewellers), causing confusion. The Court of Appeal stated that in this case the use of the name caused not only confusion but deception as well, as the name had been used as a trade mark.