By Alexander of Aphrodisias, R.W. Sharples
Alexander of Aphrodisias - the major old commentator on Aristotle - bargains interpretations to do with ethical advantage, the standards for judging activities voluntary, and so forth. Translation of textual content with remark and notes
Read or Download Alexander of Aphrodisias : ethical problems PDF
Similar greek & roman books
From being seen as an task played in sensible and political contexts, knowledge in fourth-century BC Athens got here to be conceived when it comes to theoria, or the clever guy as a ''spectator'' of fact. This e-book examines how philosophers of the interval articulated the hot perception of information and the way cultural stipulations prompted this improvement.
"God and Greek Philosophy" is a research of the most arguments for the lifestyles of a god or first causal precept within the historical Greek philosophers. Gerson's research of old Greek philosophers comprises the pre-Socratics - Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics and sceptics, and Plotinus. within the Greek philosophers, arguments for the lifestyles of God are part of typical theology, that's individual from and held to be more suitable to mythic and civic theology.
Pettersson demonstrates the consequences and purposes of the idea via a chain of distinctive stories of literary works, taking care to teach that his conception is suitable with a extensive number of views. Combining an intimate wisdom of contemporary literary conception and the aesthetics of literature with leading edge functions of linguistics and cognitive psychology to the literary paintings, he offers a radical remedy of basic difficulties within the region, together with the idea that of a textual content or paintings, the idea that of shape, and the uniqueness of the literary use of language.
- Plato and his Predecessors: The Dramatisation of Reason (The W. B. Stanford Memorial Lectures)
- Socratic Virtue: Making the Best of the Neither-Good-Nor-Bad
- Disertaciones por Arriano / Dissertations by Arrian (Spanish Edition)
- The Philosophy of Antiochus
Additional info for Alexander of Aphrodisias : ethical problems
Cf. above, P. Eth. ; cf. 13,1153b4-6. Madigan (1978) 1276 and n. 74. ) betraying a friend, which is desirable - one should feel pain at such an act - there is opposed pleasure in betraying a friend, which is undesirable. 80 This may indicate the record of an actual discussion; cf. above, n. 74. It seems to refer not just to 170,20-3 but to the whole subsequent development of the argument, and the recording of that development is a large part of the reason for this Problem in its present form existing at all; it is indeed in a way just a restatement of what was found difficult at the beginning of the text (127,5-7), but now stated in terms of distinctions between different types of pleasures.
For the person who is compelled by someone does not have some end set before himself for the sake of which he is compelled by the one who compels him. The person who compels someone and acts* does have some end set before him, and it is on account of this that he
Eth. ; 6 126,11; Madigan (1987) 1276 and n. 23. Perhaps the thought is that a virtuous action may involve the pain of physical effort without occasioning distress. 77 A euphemism: 'not like this' is equivalent to 'are to be avoided'. 32 Problem 7 78 chosen. 79 And the reason why not all pleasure is a good is that 20 not all distress is an evil either. 80 Even for those who suppose that all distress is an evil, it does not necessarily follow either that all pleasure is a good or that it is all an evil, [even] accepting that pleasure is opposed to distress.