Advances in logic, artificial intelligence and robotics by Abe J M (eds )

By Abe J M (eds )

Show description

Read or Download Advances in logic, artificial intelligence and robotics Laptec 2002 PDF

Best technique books

Recent developments of electrical drives: best papers from the International Conference on Electrical Machines, ICEM'04

Fresh advancements of electric units  is composed of the papers which have been provided on the XVI foreign convention on electric Machines - ICEM2004, which was once held in Cracow, Poland on September 5-8, 2004. The contributions chosen for the e-book conceal a large spectrum of concept and perform, therefore they're deeply rooted in engineering difficulties, being concurrently of excessive theoretical point.

Engineering of Functional Skeletal Tissues (Topics in Bone Biology, 3)

This can be the third quantity in a chain of studies founded at the unmarried significant subject of bone alternative, discussing the biology of stem cells and mobile indications, the information had to make stem cell-engineered bone tissue a fact, and the way to avoid bone allograft an infection. important as a followup to its predecessors, and as a stand-alone reference, it's going to curiosity a wide viewers from orthopedists and bioengineers to dentists.

Additional info for Advances in logic, artificial intelligence and robotics Laptec 2002

Example text

Now we define a different mapping TN that maps an interpretation of annotated formulas into itself. [Definition 4] Let J// be a Herbrand interpretation of the annotated logic. Then. 4 and J// satisfies the formula^ }. where U denotes the least upper bound. We define a special interpretation A to be an interpretation which assigns the value / to all members of B^. |r/ < A}. [Theorem 1] Let A be a ground atom and P a logic program. A is a logical consequence of P <=> P^ \= ( A : s ) . [Proof] Since "A is a logical consequence of P is equivalent to A G Tp t ^ this theorem is proved by induction on the least integer d such that A € Tp t d and TN t d \= (A : s).

Therefore, we give an automated theorem proving method for the many-sorted theory SEn as it is. G. and Winograd,T. : An Overview of KRL. a Knowledge Representation Language. L. and Lee. E. : Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. J. : Automatic Deduction and Equality. Proc. of the 1979 Annual Conf. ACM. E. : On the Relation between Free Description Theories and Standard Quantification Theory. NDFJL, 17 (1976) [5] Hayes,P. J. : The Logic of Frames, in Frame Conceptions and Text Understanding.

T m ) ) = I . iff ) A Vyi(Ei(yi) -+ (B * (yt) = x, = yt))V (~ (Eifa) A Vyi(E(yi) -)• (5 * (^) = x, = yi))) A x, - a,) A P(t\ . . , xit . . , t m ))) - 1 iff if €i is the unique element of Gi such that V^-B * (yi)) = 1 and Vfa) = e"j, or there is no such element and Vfa) = K(OJ) € Gi, then F(P(^, . . , xt, . . , t m ) ) = 1. Since B(XI) contains no description, from [Case 1] and by induction, U(Bfa)) = l iff V ( B * ( V i ) ) = l. Hence, U(P(tl, . . , ix&fa), . . , t m )) = 1 iff V((P(t\ .

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.37 of 5 – based on 19 votes